Epson WF-C5290BA Error Code 0x82DF Part 53726

Epson WF-C5290BA Error 0x82DF

Epson WF-C5290BA Error 0x82DF

The Epson WF-C5290BA printer occasionally encounters an error code 0x82DF, which is displayed on its screen. This error, known as the ILS no reflected light error, indicates a problem with the printer’s PIS sensor and can be caused by various factors.

One possible reason for this error is insufficient electric voltage reaching the PIS sensor. This can occur due to an electrical issue or a malfunction in the printer’s power supply. Another potential cause is a failure within the main board of the printer, which disrupts the functionality of the PIS sensor. Additionally, the PIS sensor itself may have deteriorated over time, leading to the error code 0x82DF.

An inadequate amount of reflected light from the l/C (light conductor) can also trigger this error. This may be caused by dirty or obstructed components, such as the l/C lens or the light source. It is essential to keep these elements clean and free from any debris or blockages to ensure proper light reflection.

To troubleshoot this error, several steps can be taken. Initially, ensure that the printer is connected to a stable power source and that the voltage is within the required range. If the error persists, try restarting the printer to reset any temporary glitches. Clean the l/C lens and light source thoroughly to enhance light reflection. If none of these troubleshooting efforts resolve the issue, it is recommended to contact Epson’s customer support or a qualified technician for further assistance.

Addressing the Epson WF-C5290BA error code 0x82DF promptly and methodically will help ensure uninterrupted printing operations and maintain the printer’s optimum performance.

Printer Model Epson WF-C5290BA
Error Code 0x82DF
Display on PRINTER
Description and troubleshooting ILS no reflected light error. Electric voltage for the PIS sensor is insufficient. Failure of the main board. The PIS sensor has deteriorated. Reflected light from the l/C is insufficient.

Add Comment